|
A. SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies)
|
3 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mar. 31, 2014
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| General |
General
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Telkonet, Inc. (the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with Rule S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and with the instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. However, the results from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2014, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2014. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated December 31, 2013 financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company's Form 10-K filed with the SEC. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Business and Basis of Presentation |
Business and Basis of Presentation
The Company formed in 1999 and incorporated under the laws of the state of Utah, is made up of two synergistic business divisions, EcoSmart Energy Management Technology and EthoStream High Speed Internet Access (HSIA) Network.
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Telkonet Communications, Inc., and EthoStream, LLC. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Going Concern |
Going Concern
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. The Company reported a net loss of $778,208 for the three months ended March 31, 2014, and has an accumulated deficit of $122,727,055 and total current liabilities in excess of current assets of $1,402,553 as of March 31, 2014.
Our ability to continue as a going concern is subject to our ability to consistently generate a profit and positive operating cash flows and/or obtain necessary funding from outside sources, including by the sale of our securities or assets, or obtaining loans from financial institutions, where possible. We may also experience net operating losses in the future and the uncertainty regarding contingent liabilities cast doubt on our ability to satisfy such liabilities and the Company cannot make any representations for the remainder of fiscal 2014 and beyond. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.
Anticipated cash flows from operations may be insufficient to satisfy the Company’s ongoing capital requirements for at least the next 12 months. In May 2013, the Company entered into a Revolving Credit Facility (the “Agreement”) with Bridge Bank, NA (the ”Bank”), the principal not to exceed $2,000,000. This credit facility is available for working capital and other lawful business purposes. The Company’s borrowing base at March 31, 2014 was approximately $470,000 and the outstanding balance was $201,275. As of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company was in violation of a financial performance covenant. Although the Company’s violation of the financial performance covenant constitutes a default under the Agreement, as of May 15, 2014, the Bank has not chosen to pursue any remedies under the default provisions of the Agreement. The potential remedies available to the Bank include the ability to accelerate the outstanding principal balance of the facility, which was $50,000 as of May 15, 2014, and/or to cease making advances or extending other financial accommodations to the Company. The Company is exploring alternatives regarding the Agreement, which could include modification of the Agreement, termination of the Agreement, which would require the Company to pay the entire outstanding principal balance of the facility, or refinancing the outstanding balance with another lender. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in obtaining a modification of the Agreement or financing through another lender, on acceptable terms, if at all.
Management intends to review the options for raising capital including, but not limited to, through asset-based financing, private placements, and/or disposition of assets. Management believes that if it is able to obtain this financing, the Company will be able to generate additional revenues that will allow the Company to continue as a going concern. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in obtaining additional funding or generate sufficient additional revenues. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Restricted Cash on Deposit |
Restricted Cash on Deposit
During 2012, the Company was awarded a contract with a bonding requirement. The Company satisfied this requirement during the year ended December 31, 2013, with cash collateral supported by an irrevocable standby letter of credit in the amount of $382,000 which was to expire September 30, 2014, or sooner if the Company satisfied all obligations under the arrangement. The amount is presented as restricted cash on deposit on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2013. In March 2014, the Company satisfied all obligations related to the bonding requirement and the cash was released. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income (Loss) per Common Share |
Income (Loss) per Common Share
The Company computes net income (loss) per share under ASC 260-10, “Earnings Per Share”. Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding of common stock. Diluted income (loss) per share is computed using the weighted average number of common and common stock equivalent shares outstanding during the year. Dilutive common stock equivalents consist of shares issuable upon the exercise of the Company's outstanding stock options and warrants. As a result of the losses in the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, there were 11,095,139 and 10,229,208 shares of common stock underlying options and warrants excluded, respectively, as their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Estimates |
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income Taxes |
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740-10 “Income Taxes.” Under this method, deferred income taxes (when required) are provided based on the difference between the financial reporting and income tax bases of assets and liabilities and net operating losses at the statutory rates enacted for future periods. The Company has a policy of establishing a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that the Company will not realize the benefits of its deferred income tax assets in the future.
The Company adopted ASC 740-10-25, which prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. ASC 740-10-25 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, treatment of interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods and disclosure and transition related to the uncertainty in these income tax positions. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenue Recognition |
Revenue Recognition
For revenue from product sales, we recognize revenue in accordance with ASC 605-10, “Revenue Recognition” and ASC Topic 13 guidelines that require that four basic criteria must be met before revenue can be recognized: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred; (3) the selling price is fixed and determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. Determination of criteria (3) and (4) are based on management’s judgments regarding the fixed nature of the selling prices of the products delivered and the collectability of those amounts. Provisions for discounts and rebates to customers, estimated returns and allowances, and other adjustments are provided for in the same period the related sales are recorded. The guidelines also address the accounting for arrangements that may involve the delivery or performance of multiple products, services and/or rights to use assets.
Multiple-Element Arrangements (“MEAs”): The Company accounts for large contracts that have both product and installation under the MEAs guidance in ASC 605. The Company believes the volume of these large contracts will continue to increase. Arrangements under such contracts may include multiple deliverables, a combination of equipment and services. The deliverables included in the MEAs are separated into more than one unit of accounting when (i) the delivered equipment has value to the customer on a stand-alone basis, and (ii) delivery of the undelivered service element(s) is probable and substantially in our control. Arrangement consideration is then allocated to each unit, delivered or undelivered, based on the relative selling price of each unit of accounting based first on vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) if it exists, second on third-party evidence (“TPE”) if it exists and on estimated selling price (“ESP”) if neither VSOE or TPE exist.
When MEAs include an element of customer training, it is not essential to the functionality, efficiency or effectiveness of the MEA. Therefore the Company has concluded that this obligation is inconsequential and perfunctory. As such, for MEAs that include training, customer acceptance of said training is not deemed necessary in order to record the related revenue, but is recorded when the installation deliverable is fulfilled. Historically, training revenues have not been significant.
We provide call center support services to properties installed by us and also to properties installed by other providers. In addition, we provide the property with the portal to access the Internet. We receive monthly service fees from such properties for our services and Internet access. We recognize the service fee ratably over the term of the contract. The prices for these services are fixed and determinable prior to delivery of the service. The fair value of these services is known due to objective and reliable evidence from standalone executed contracts. We report such revenues as recurring revenues. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Guarantees and Product Warranties |
Guarantees and Product Warranties
The Company records a liability for potential warranty claims in cost of sales at the time of sale. The amount of the liability is based on the trend in the historical ratio of claims to sales, the historical length of time between the sale and resulting warranty claim, new product introductions and other factors. The products sold are generally covered by a warranty for a period of one year. In the event the Company determines that its current or future product repair and replacement costs exceed its estimates, an adjustment to these reserves would be charged to earnings in the period such determination is made. For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company experienced returns of approximately 1% to 4% of materials included in the cost of sales. As of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company recorded warranty liabilities in the amount of $74,943 and $77,943, respectively.
Product warranties for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and the year ended December 31, 2013 are as follows:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lease Abandonment |
Lease Abandonment
On July 15, 2011, the Company executed a sublease agreement for approximately 12,000 square feet of commercial office space in Germantown, Maryland. Because we no longer have access to this subleased space, we recorded a charge of $59,937 in accrued liabilities and expenses related to this abandonment during 2011. On June 27, 2012 the subtenant exercised the option to extend the expiration of the term of the sublease from January 31, 2013 to December 31, 2015 and we recorded an additional charge of $132,174. The remaining liability at March 31, 2014 was $80,238 and at December 31, 2013 was $91,981. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||