U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
For the transition period from __________ to __________.
Commission file number 001-31972
TELKONET, INC.
(Exact name of Issuer as specified in its charter)
Utah | 87-0627421 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
10200 Innovation Drive, Suite 300, Milwaukee, WI | 53226 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip Code) |
(414) 223-0473
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company x |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Yes o No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date: 108,103,001 shares of Common Stock ($.001 par value) as of May 2, 2013.
TELKONET, INC.
FORM 10-Q for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2013
Index
Page | |
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION | 3 |
Item 1. Financial Statements | 3 |
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets: March 31, 2013 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2012 |
3 |
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited): Three Months Ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 |
4 |
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited): January 1, 2013 through March 31, 2013 |
5 |
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited): Three Months Ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 |
6 |
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) | 8 |
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 21 |
Item 4. Controls and Procedures | 26 |
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION | 26 |
Item 1. Legal Proceedings | 26 |
Item 1A. Risk Factors | 27 |
Item 6. Exhibits | 27 |
2 |
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
TELKONET, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited) March 31, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | |||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 1,225,866 | $ | 1,163,758 | ||||
Restricted cash on deposit | 382,000 | – | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net | 1,697,611 | 3,026,107 | ||||||
Inventories | 1,043,699 | 654,912 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses | 120,944 | 189,879 | ||||||
Total current assets | 4,470,120 | 5,034,656 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net | 46,925 | 35,898 | ||||||
Other assets: | ||||||||
Goodwill | 8,570,446 | 8,570,446 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net | 1,439,877 | 1,500,297 | ||||||
Deposits | 34,238 | 34,238 | ||||||
Total other assets | 10,044,561 | 10,104,981 | ||||||
Total Assets | $ | 14,561,606 | $ | 15,175,535 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 1,784,768 | $ | 1,967,030 | ||||
Notes payable – current | 280,984 | 74,611 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities and expenses | 2,224,586 | 2,342,047 | ||||||
Deferred revenues | 233,891 | 117,556 | ||||||
Customer deposits | 110,438 | 118,763 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 4,634,667 | 4,620,007 | ||||||
Long-term liabilities: | ||||||||
Deferred lease liability | 133,495 | 133,609 | ||||||
Notes payable – long term | 595,276 | 813,928 | ||||||
Total long-term liabilities | 728,771 | 947,537 | ||||||
Redeemable preferred stock: 15,000,000 shares authorized, par value $.001 per share | ||||||||
Series A; 215 shares issued, 185 shares outstanding at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, preference in liquidation of $1,194,329 and $1,176,076 as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively | 1,077,598 | 1,041,837 | ||||||
Series B; 538 shares issued, 493 shares outstanding at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, preference in liquidation of $2,933,481 and $2,884,833 as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively | 2,360,888 | 2,223,752 | ||||||
Total redeemable preferred stock | 3,438,486 | 3,265,589 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies | – | – | ||||||
Stockholders’ Equity | ||||||||
Common stock, par value $.001 per share; 190,000,000 shares authorized; 108,103,001 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively | 108,103 | 108,103 | ||||||
Additional paid-in-capital | 124,017,541 | 124,188,415 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit | (118,365,962 | ) | (117,954,116 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 5,759,682 | 6,342,402 | ||||||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | $ | 14,561,606 | $ | 15,175,535 |
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements
3 |
TELKONET, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
For The Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2013 | 2012 | |||||||
Revenues, net: | ||||||||
Product | $ | 2,165,500 | $ | 917,929 | ||||
Recurring | 962,134 | 1,010,672 | ||||||
Total Net Revenues | 3,127,634 | 1,928,601 | ||||||
Cost of Sales: | ||||||||
Product | 1,429,546 | 600,809 | ||||||
Recurring | 266,163 | 289,909 | ||||||
Total Cost of Sales | 1,695,709 | 890,718 | ||||||
Gross Profit | 1,431,925 | 1,037,883 | ||||||
Operating Expenses: | ||||||||
Research and development | 302,142 | 230,564 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative | 1,460,593 | 1,431,781 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 64,118 | 72,598 | ||||||
Total Operating Expense | 1,826,853 | 1,734,943 | ||||||
Loss from Operations | (394,928 | ) | (697,060 | ) | ||||
Other Income (Expenses): | ||||||||
Interest expense, net | (16,638 | ) | (31,764 | ) | ||||
Total Other Income (Expense) | (16,638 | ) | (31,764 | ) | ||||
Loss Before Provision for Income Taxes | (411,566 | ) | (728,824 | ) | ||||
Provision for Income Taxes | 280 | – | ||||||
Net Loss | (411,846 | ) | (728,824 | ) | ||||
Accretion of preferred dividends and discount | (172,897 | ) | (190,753 | ) | ||||
Net loss attributable to common stockholders | $ | (584,743 | ) | $ | (919,577 | ) | ||
Net income (loss) per common share: | ||||||||
Income (loss) per common share – basic | $ | 0.00 | $ | (0.01 | ) | |||
Income (loss) per common share – diluted | $ | 0.00 | $ | (0.01 | ) | |||
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding – basic | 108,103,001 | 104,351,326 | ||||||
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding – diluted | 109,522,960 | 106,457,737 |
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements
4 |
TELKONET, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (UNAUDITED)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS FROM JANUARY 1, 2013 THROUGH MARCH 31, 2013
Common Shares | Common Stock Amount | Additional Paid in Capital | Accumulated Deficit | Total Stockholders’ Equity | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2013 | 108,103,001 | $ | 108,103 | $ | 124,188,415 | $ | (117,954,116 | ) | $ | 6,342,402 | ||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense related to employee stock options | – | – | 2,023 | – | 2,023 | |||||||||||||||
Accretion of redeemable preferred stock discount | – | – | (105,996 | ) | – | (105,996 | ) | |||||||||||||
Accretion of redeemable preferred stock dividends | – | – | (66,901 | ) | – | (66,901 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net loss | (411,846 | ) | (411,846 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2013 | 108,103,001 | $ | 108,103 | $ | 124,017,541 | $ | (118,365,962 | ) | $ | 5,759,682 |
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements
5 |
TELKONET, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
For the Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2013 | 2012 | |||||||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: | ||||||||
Net loss | $ | (411,846 | ) | $ | (728,824 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) from operations to cash (used in) provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Stock based compensation expense | 2,023 | 36,165 | ||||||
Depreciation | 3,698 | 12,178 | ||||||
Amortization | 60,420 | 60,420 | ||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts | (927 | ) | 796 | |||||
Increase / decrease in: | ||||||||
Accounts receivable | 1,329,423 | 462,401 | ||||||
Inventories | (388,787 | ) | (553,801 | ) | ||||
Prepaid expenses | 68,935 | 112,301 | ||||||
Accounts payable | (182,262 | ) | 95,422 | |||||
Accrued liabilities & expenses | (117,461 | ) | 93,872 | |||||
Deferred revenue | 116,335 | (17,506 | ) | |||||
Customer deposits | (8,325 | ) | 25,777 | |||||
Deferred lease liability | (114 | ) | 6,224 | |||||
Net Cash Provided by (Used In) Operating Activities | 471,112 | (394,575 | ) | |||||
Cash Flows From Investing Activities: | ||||||||
Purchase of property and equipment | (14,725 | ) | (3,995 | ) | ||||
Deposit of restricted cash | (382,000 | ) | – | |||||
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities | (396,725 | ) | (3,995 | ) | ||||
Cash Flows From Financing Activities: | ||||||||
Payments on note payable | (12,279 | ) | (24,783 | ) | ||||
Net Cash Used In Financing Activities | (12,279 | ) | (24,783 | ) | ||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 62,108 | (423,353 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period | 1,163,758 | 961,091 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period | $ | 1,225,866 | $ | 537,738 |
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements
6 |
TELKONET, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
For the Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2013 | 2012 | |||||||
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information: | ||||||||
Cash transactions: | ||||||||
Cash paid during the period for interest expense | $ | 1,365 | $ | 1,745 | ||||
Non-cash transactions: | ||||||||
Accretion of discount on redeemable preferred stock | $ | 105,996 | $ | 123,111 | ||||
Accretion of dividends on redeemable preferred stock | 66,901 | 67,642 |
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements
7 |
TELKONET, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 2013
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE A – SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of the significant accounting policies applied in the preparation of the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements follows.
General
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Telkonet, Inc. (the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with Rule S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and with the instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. However, the results from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2013, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2013. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated December 31, 2012 financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company's Form 10-K filed with the SEC.
Business and Basis of Presentation
Telkonet, Inc., formed in 1999 and incorporated under the laws of the state of Utah, is made up of two synergistic business divisions, EcoSmart Energy Management Technology and EthoStream High Speed Internet Access (HSIA) Network. Prior to January 1, 2007, the Company was primarily engaged in the business of developing, producing and marketing proprietary equipment enabling the transmission of voice and data communications over a building’s internal electrical wiring.
In March 2007, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of Smart Systems International (“SSI”), a provider of energy management products and solutions to customers in the United States and Canada.
In March 2007, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding membership units of EthoStream, LLC, a network solutions integration company that offers installation, sales and service to the hospitality industry. The EthoStream acquisition enabled Telkonet to provide installation and support for PLC products and third party applications to customers across North America.
In March 2011, the Company sold all its Series 5 PLC power line carrier product line and related assets to Wisconsin-based Dynamic Ratings, Inc. under an Asset Purchase Agreement.
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Telkonet Communications, Inc., and EthoStream, LLC. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Going Concern
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. The Company reported a net loss of $411,846 for the period ended March 31, 2013, and has an accumulated deficit of $118,365,962 and total current liabilities in excess of current assets of $164,547 as of March 31, 2013.
Although we had net income in 2012 and positive cash flows from operations for the period ended March 31, 2013, these results have not been achieved on a consistent basis. Our ability to continue as a going concern is subject to our ability to consistently generate a profit and positive operating cashflows and/or obtain necessary funding from outside sources, including by the sale of our securities or assets, or obtaining loans from financial institutions, where possible. We may also experience net operating losses in the future and the uncertainty regarding contingent liabilities cast doubt on our ability to satisfy such liabilities and the Company cannot make any representations for fiscal 2013 and beyond. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.
The Company believes that anticipated cashflows from operations may be insufficient to satisfy its ongoing capital requirements for at least the next 12 months. If the Company’s financial resources from operations are insufficient, the Company will require additional funding in order to execute its operating plan and continue as a going concern. The Company cannot predict whether this additional financing, if it is required, will be in the form of equity or debt, or be in another form. The Company may not be able to obtain the necessary additional capital on a timely basis, on acceptable terms, or at all. In any of these events, the Company may be unable to implement its current plans for expansion, repay its debt obligations as they become due, or respond to competitive pressures, any of which circumstances would have a material adverse effect on its business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
8 |
TELKONET, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 2013
(UNAUDITED)
Management intends to review the options for raising capital including, but not limited to, asset-based financing, private placements, and/or disposition of assets. Management believes that with this financing, the Company will be able to generate additional revenues that will allow the Company to continue as a going concern. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in obtaining additional funding.
Restricted Cash on Deposit
During 2012, the Company was awarded a contract with a bonding requirement. The Company satisfied this requirement during the period ended March 31, 2013, with cash collateral supported by an irrevocable standby letter of credit in the amount of $382,000 which expires September 30, 2013. The amount is presented as restricted cash on deposit on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Goodwill and Other Intangibles
In accordance with the accounting guidance on goodwill and other intangible assets, we perform an annual impairment test of goodwill and other tangible assets at our reporting unit level, or more frequently if events or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of our reporting units below their carrying value. Amortization is recorded for other intangible assets with determinable lives using the straight line method over the 12 year estimated useful life. Goodwill is subject to a periodic impairment assessment by applying a fair value test based upon a two-step method. The first step of the process compares the fair value of the reporting unit with the carrying value of the reporting unit, including any goodwill. We utilize a discounted cash flow valuation methodology to determine the fair value of the reporting unit. This approach is developed from management’s forecasted cash flow data. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds the carrying amount of the reporting unit, goodwill is deemed not to be impaired. If the carrying amount exceeds fair value, we calculate an impairment loss. Any impairment loss is measured by comparing the implied fair value of goodwill to the carrying amount of goodwill at the reporting unit, with the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value recognized as an impairment loss.
Long-Lived Assets
We review long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable in accordance with ASC 360-10 “Impairment and Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”. Recoverability is measured by comparison of the carrying amount to the future net cash flows which the assets are expected to generate. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the projected future cash flows arising from the asset determined by management to be commensurate with the risk inherent to our current business model.
Income (Loss) per Common Share
The Company computes income (loss) per share under ASC 260-10, “Earnings Per Share”. Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding of common stock. Diluted income (loss) per share is computed using the weighted average number of common and common stock equivalent shares outstanding during the year. Dilutive common stock equivalents consist of shares issuable upon the exercise of the Company's outstanding stock options and warrants. For the periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, there were 10,229,208 and 12,580,600 shares of common stock underlying options and warrants excluded, respectively.
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740-10 “Income Taxes.” Under this method, deferred income taxes (when required) are provided based on the difference between the financial reporting and income tax bases of assets and liabilities and net operating losses at the statutory rates enacted for future periods. The Company has a policy of establishing a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that the Company will not realize the benefits of its deferred income tax assets in the future.
9 |
TELKONET, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 2013
(UNAUDITED)
The Company adopted ASC 740-10-25, which prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. ASC 740-10-25 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, treatment of interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods and disclosure and transition related to the uncertainty in these income tax positions.
Revenue Recognition
For revenue from product sales, we recognize revenue in accordance with ASC 605-10, “Revenue Recognition” and ASC Topic 13 guidelines that require that four basic criteria must be met before revenue can be recognized: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred; (3) the selling price is fixed and determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. Determination of criteria (3) and (4) are based on management’s judgments regarding the fixed nature of the selling prices of the products delivered and the collectability of those amounts. Provisions for discounts and rebates to customers, estimated returns and allowances, and other adjustments are provided for in the same period the related sales are recorded. The guidelines also address the accounting for arrangements that may involve the delivery or performance of multiple products, services and/or rights to use assets.
Multiple-Element Arrangements (“MEAs”): The Company accounts for large contracts that have both product and installation under the MEAs guidance in ASC 605. The Company believes the volume of these large contracts will continue to increase. Arrangements under such contracts may include multiple deliverables, a combination of equipment and services. The deliverables included in the MEAs are separated into more than one unit of accounting when (i) the delivered equipment has value to the customer on a stand-alone basis, and (ii) delivery of the undelivered service element(s) is probable and substantially in our control. Arrangement consideration is then allocated to each unit, delivered or undelivered, based on the relative selling price (“RSP”) of each unit of accounting based first on vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) if it exists, second on third-party evidence (“TPE”) if it exists and on estimated selling price (“ESP”) if neither VSOE or TPE exist.
· | VSOE – In most instances, products are sold separately in stand-alone arrangements. Services are also sold separately through renewals of contracts with varying periods. We determine VSOE based on its pricing and discounting practices for the specific product or service when sold separately, considering geographical, customer, and other economic or marketing variables, as well as renewal rates or stand-alone prices for the service element(s). |
· | TPE – If we cannot establish VSOE of selling price for a specific product or service included in a multiple-element arrangement, we use third-party evidence of selling price. We determine TPE based on sales of comparable amount of similar product or service offered by multiple third parties considering the degree of customization and similarity of product or service sold. |
· | ESP – The estimated selling price represents the price at which we would sell a product or service if it were sold on a stand-alone basis. When neither VSOE nor TPE exists for all elements, we determine ESP for the arrangement element based on sales, cost and margin analysis, as well as other inputs based on its pricing practices. Adjustments for other market and Company-specific factors are made as deemed necessary in determining ESP. |
When MEAs include an element of customer training, it is not essential to the functionality, efficiency or effectiveness of the MEA. Therefore the Company has concluded that this obligation is inconsequential and perfunctory. As such, for MEAs that include training, customer acceptance is not deemed necessary in order to record the related revenue, but is recorded when the installation deliverable is fulfilled. Historically, training revenues have not been significant.
We provide call center support services to properties installed by us and also to properties installed by other providers. In addition, we provide the property with the portal to access the Internet. We receive monthly service fees from such properties for our services and Internet access. We recognize the service fee ratably over the term of the contract. The prices for these services are fixed and determinable prior to delivery of the service. The fair value of these services is known due to objective and reliable evidence from contracts and standalone sales. We report such revenues as recurring revenues.
10 |
TELKONET, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 2013
(UNAUDITED)
Guarantees and Product Warranties
The Company records a liability for potential warranty claims in cost of sales at the time of sale. The amount of the liability is based on the trend in the historical ratio of claims to sales, the historical length of time between the sale and resulting warranty claim, new product introductions and other factors. The products sold are generally covered by a warranty for a period of one year. In the event the Company determines that its current or future product repair and replacement costs exceed its estimates, an adjustment to these reserves would be charged to earnings in the period such determination is made. For the period ended March 31, 2013 and the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company experienced returns of approximately 1% to 4% of material’s included in the cost of sales. For the period ended March 31, 2013 and the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company recorded warranty liabilities in the amount of $67,443 and $69,743, respectively, using this experience factor range.
Product warranties for the periods ended March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are as follows:
March 31, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | |||||||
Beginning balance | $ | 69,743 | $ | 104,423 | ||||
Warranty claims incurred | (352 | ) | (66,278 | ) | ||||
Provision charged to expense | (1,948 | ) | 31,598 | |||||
Ending balance | $ | 67,443 | $ | 69,743 |
Stock-Based Compensation
We account for our stock based awards in accordance with ASC 718-10, “Compensation”, which requires a fair value measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to our employees and directors, including employee stock options and restricted stock awards. We estimate the fair value of stock options granted using the Black-Scholes valuation model. This model requires us to make estimates and assumptions including, among other things, estimates regarding the length of time an employee will hold vested stock options before exercising them, the estimated volatility of our common stock price and the number of options that may be forfeited prior to vesting. The fair value is then amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the awards, which is generally the vesting period. Changes in these estimates and assumptions can materially affect the determination of the fair value of stock-based compensation and consequently, the related amount recognized in our condensed consolidated statements of operations.
The expected term of the options represents the estimated period of time until exercise and is based on historical experience of similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms, vesting schedules and expectations of future employee behavior. For 2013 and prior years, expected stock price volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock for the related vesting periods.
Stock-based compensation expense in connection with options granted to employees for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 was $2,023 and $6,165, respectively.
Deferred Lease Liability
Rent expense is recorded on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Rent escalations and rent abatement periods during the term of the lease create a deferred lease liability which represents the excess of cumulative rent expense recorded to date over the actual rent paid to date.
Lease Abandonment
On July 15, 2011, the Company executed a sublease agreement for approximately 12,000 square feet of commercial office space in Germantown, Maryland. Because we no longer have access to this subleased space, we recorded a charge of $59,937 in accrued liabilities and expenses related to this abandonment during 2011. On June 27, 2012 the subtenant exercised the option to extend the expiration of the term of the sublease from January 31, 2013 to December 31, 2015 and we recorded an additional charge of $132,174. The remaining liability at March 31, 2013 was $124,572.
NOTE B – NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
None.
11 |
TELKONET, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 2013
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE C – INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL
Total identifiable intangible assets acquired and their carrying values at March 31, 2013 are:
Cost |
Accumulated Amortization |
Carrying Value |
Weighted Average Amortization Period (Years) |
|||||||||||||
Amortized Identifiable Intangible Assets: | ||||||||||||||||
Subscriber lists – EthoStream | $ | 2,900,000 | $ | (1,460,123 | ) | $ | 1,439,877 | 12.0 | ||||||||
Total Amortized Identifiable Intangible Assets |
2,900,000 |
(1,460,123 |
) |
1,439,877 |
||||||||||||
Goodwill – EthoStream | 5,796,430 | – | 5,796,430 | |||||||||||||
Goodwill – SSI | 2,774,016 | – | 2,774,016 | |||||||||||||
Total Goodwill | 8,570,446 | – | 8,570,446 | |||||||||||||
Total | $ | 11,470,446 | $ | (1,460,123 | ) | $ | 10,010,323 |
Total identifiable intangible assets acquired and their carrying values at December 31, 2012 are:
Cost |
Accumulated Amortization |
Accumulated Impairment | Carrying Value |
Weighted Average Amortization Period (Years) |
||||||||||||||||
Amortized Identifiable Intangible Assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Subscriber lists – EthoStream | $ | 2,900,000 | $ | (1,399,703 | ) | $ | – | $ | 1,500,297 | 12.0 | ||||||||||
Total Amortized Identifiable Intangible Assets | 2,900,000 | (1,399,703 | ) | – | 1,500,297 | |||||||||||||||
Goodwill – EthoStream | 8,796,430 | – | (3,000,000) | 5,796,430 | ||||||||||||||||
Goodwill – SSI | 5,874,016 | – | (3,100,000) | 2,774,016 | ||||||||||||||||
Total Goodwill | 14,670,446 | (6,100,000) | 8,570,446 | |||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 17,570,446 | $ | (1,399,703 | ) | $ | (6,100,000) | $ | 10,070,743 |
Total amortization expense charged to operations for each of the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 was $60,420.
Estimated amortization expense as of March 31, 2013 is as follows:
Remainder of 2013 | $ | 181,260 | ||
2014 | 241,680 | |||
2015 | 241,680 | |||
2016 | 241,680 | |||
2017 | 241,680 | |||
2018 and after | 291,897 | |||
Total | $ | 1,439,877 |
The Company does not amortize goodwill. The Company recorded goodwill in the amount of $14,670,446 as a result of the acquisitions of EthoStream and SSI during the year ended December 31, 2007. The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment based on the fair value of the operating business units to which this goodwill relates at least once a year. We utilize a discounted cash flow valuation methodology (income approach) to determine the fair value of the reporting unit. Since acquisition, the Company has written off $3,000,000 and $3,100,000 of goodwill for Ethostream and Smart Systems International, respectively.
12 |
TELKONET, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 2013
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE D – ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
Components of accounts receivable as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are as follows:
March 31, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | |||||||
Accounts receivable | $ | 1,724,062 | $ | 3,096,914 | ||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | (26,451 | ) | (70,807 | ) | ||||
Accounts receivable, net | $ | 1,697,611 | $ | 3,026,107 |
NOTE E – INVENTORIES
Components of inventories as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are as follows:
March 31, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | |||||||
Merchandise purchased for resale | $ | 1,162,999 | $ | 768,812 | ||||
Reserve for obsolescence | (119,300 | ) | (113,900 | ) | ||||
Inventory, net | $ | 1,043,699 | $ | 654,912 |
NOTE F – ACCRUED LIABILITIES AND EXPENSES
Accrued liabilities and expenses at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are as follows:
March 31, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | |||||||
Accrued liabilities and expenses | $ | 611,319 | $ | 717,731 | ||||
Accrued payroll and payroll taxes | 351,904 | 345,384 | ||||||
Accrued sales taxes, penalties, and interest | 1,162,482 | 1,188,136 | ||||||
Accrued interest | 31,438 | 21,053 | ||||||
Product warranties | 67,443 | 69,743 | ||||||
Total | $ | 2,224,586 | $ | 2,342,047 |
NOTE G – LONG TERM DEBT
On September 11, 2009, the Company entered into a Loan Agreement in the aggregate principal amount of $300,000 with the Wisconsin Department of Commerce (the “Department”). The outstanding principal balance bears interest at the annual rate of 2%. Payment of interest and principal is to be made in the following manner: (a) payment of any and all interest that accrues from the date of disbursement commenced on January 1, 2010 and continued on the first day of each consecutive month thereafter through and including December 31, 2010; (b) commencing on January 1, 2011 and continuing on the first day of each consecutive month thereafter through and including November 1, 2016, the Company shall pay equal monthly installments of $4,426 each; followed by a final installment on December 1, 2016 which shall include all remaining principal, accrued interest and other amounts owed by the Company to the Department under the Loan Agreement. The Company may prepay amounts outstanding under the credit facility in whole or in part at any time without penalty. The Loan Agreement is secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets and the proceeds from this loan were used for the working capital requirements of the Company. The Loan Agreement contains covenants which require, among other things, that the Company shall keep and maintain 75 existing full-time positions and create and fill 35 additional full-time positions in Milwaukee, Wisconsin by December 31, 2012. On June 18, 2012, the Department agreed to waive all penalties associated with the Company’s noncompliance with this covenant. The outstanding borrowings under the agreement as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were $191,668 and $203,947, respectively.
13 |
TELKONET, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 2013
(UNAUDITED)
Promissory Note #1
On March 4, 2011, the Company sold all its Series 5 PLC product line assets to Wisconsin-based Dynamic Ratings, Inc. (“Purchaser”) under an Asset Purchase Agreement (“APA”). Per the APA, the Company signed an unsecured Promissory Note (“Note #1”) due to purchaser in the aggregate principal amount of $700,000. The outstanding principal balance bears interest at the annual rate of 6% and was originally due on March 31, 2014. Note #1 may be prepaid in whole or in part, without penalty at any time. Note #1 contains certain earn-out provisions that encompass both the Company’s and Purchaser’s revenue volumes. Amounts earned under the earn-out provisions shall be applied against Note #1 on June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2013. As of June 30, 2012, the non cash reduction of principal calculated under these provisions and applied to the note was $15,408. Payments not made when due, by maturity acceleration or otherwise, shall bear interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date due until fully paid. Effective April 30, 2013, Purchaser approved an amendment to certain terms of the Note #1. Telkonet has agreed to commence a monthly payment of principal and interest of $20,000 to be applied against the outstanding balance starting May 1, 2013. The interest rate will remain unchanged at 6% and the maturity date was extended to January 1, 2016. The outstanding principal balance of Note #1 as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was $684,592. The future maturities schedule below include the monthly payments required by the amended note.
Aggregate annual future maturities of long-term debt as of March 31, 2013 are as follows:
Years ended December 31, | Amount | |||
2013 (remainder of) | $ | 215,786 | ||
2014 | 265,985 | |||
2015 | 280,295 | |||
2016 | 114,194 | |||
876,260 | ||||
Less: Current portion | (280,984 | ) | ||
Notes payable long term | $ | 595,276 |
NOTE H – REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK
Series A
The Company has designated 215 shares of preferred stock as Series A Preferred Stock (“Series A”). Each share of Series A is convertible, at the option of the holder thereof, at any time, into shares of our Common Stock at an initial conversion price of $0.363 per share. In the event of a change of control (as defined in the purchase agreement with respect to the Series A), or at the holder’s option, on November 19, 2014 and for a period of 180 days thereafter, provided that at least 50% of the shares of Series A issued on the Series A Original Issue Date remain outstanding as of November 19, 2014, and the holders of at least a majority of the then outstanding shares of Series A provide written notice requesting redemption of all shares of Series A, we are required to redeem the Series A for the purchase price plus any accrued but unpaid dividends. The Series A accrues dividends at an annual rate of 8% of the original purchase price, payable only when, as, and if declared by the Board of Directors of Telkonet.
On November 16, 2009, the Company sold 215 shares of Series A with attached warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,628,800 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.33 per share. The Series A shares were sold at a price per share of $5,000 and each Series A share is convertible into approximately 13,774 shares of common stock at a conversion price of $0.363 per share. The Company received $1,075,000 from the sale of the Series A shares. Since the Series A may ultimately be redeemable at the option of the holder, the carrying value of the preferred stock, net of discount and accumulated dividends, has been classified as redeemable preferred stock on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
A portion of the proceeds were allocated to the warrants based on their relative fair value, which totaled $287,106 using the Black Scholes option pricing model. Further, the Company attributed a beneficial conversion feature of $70,922 to the Series A preferred shares based upon the difference between the effective conversion price of those shares and the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance. The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model were as follows: (1) dividend yield of 0%; (2) expected volatility of 123%, (3) weighted average risk-free interest rate of 2.2%, (4) expected life of 5 years, and (5) estimated fair value of Telkonet common stock of $0.24 per share. The expected term of the warrants represents the estimated period of time until exercise and is based on historical experience of similar awards and giving consideration to the contractual terms. The amounts attributable to the warrants and beneficial conversion feature, aggregating $358,028, were recorded as a discount and deducted from the face value of the preferred stock. The discount is being amortized over the period from issuance to November 19, 2014 (the initial redemption date) as a charge to additional paid-in capital (since there is a deficit in retained earnings).
The charge to additional paid in capital for amortization of Series A discount and costs for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 was $17,508 and $17,901, respectively.
14 |
TELKONET, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 2013
(UNAUDITED)
For the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, we have accrued dividends for Series A in the amount of $18,253 and $18,454, respectively, and cumulative accrued dividends of $269,329 and $195,302, respectively. The accrued dividends have been charged to additional paid-in capital (since there is a deficit in retained earnings) and the net unpaid accrued dividends been added to the carrying value of the preferred stock.
Series B
The Company has designated 538 shares of preferred stock as Series B Preferred Stock (“Series B”). Each share of Series B is convertible, at the option of the holder thereof, at any time, into shares of our Common Stock at an initial conversion price of $0.13 per share. In the event of a change of control (as defined in the purchase agreement with respect to the Series B), or at the holder’s option, on November 19, 2014 and for a period of 180 days thereafter, provided that at least 50% of the shares of Series B issued on the Series B Original Issue Date remain outstanding as of November 19, 2014, and the holders of at least a majority of the then outstanding shares of Series B provide written notice requesting redemption of all shares of Series B, we are required to redeem the Series B for the purchase price plus any accrued but unpaid dividends. The Series B accrues dividends at an annual rate of 8% of the original purchase price, payable only when, as, and if declared by our Board of Directors.
On August 4, 2010, the Company sold 267 shares of Series B with attached warrants to purchase an aggregate of 5,134,626 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.13 per share. The Series B shares were sold at a price per share of $5,000 and each Series A share is convertible into approximately 38,461 shares of common stock at a conversion price of $0.13 per share. The Company received $1,335,000 from the sale of the Series B shares. Since the Series B may ultimately be redeemable at the option of the holder, the carrying value of the preferred stock, net of discount and accumulated dividends, has been classified as redeemable preferred stock on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
A portion of the proceeds was allocated to the warrants based on their relative fair value, which totaled $394,350 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Further, the Company attributed a beneficial conversion feature of $394,350 to the Series B preferred shares based upon the difference between the effective conversion price of those shares and the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance. The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model were as follows: (1) dividend yield of 0%; (2) expected volatility of 123%, (3) weighted average risk-free interest rate of 1.76%, (4) expected life of approximately 4 years, and (5) estimated fair value of Telkonet common stock of $0.109 per share. The expected term of the warrants represents the estimated period of time until exercise and is based on historical experience of similar awards and giving consideration to the contractual terms. The amounts attributable to the warrants and beneficial conversion feature, aggregating $788,700, were recorded as a discount and deducted from the face value of the preferred stock. The discount is being amortized over the period from issuance to November 19, 2014 (the initial redemption date) as a charge to additional paid-in capital (since there is a deficit in retained earnings).
On April 8, 2011, the Company sold 271 additional shares of Series B with attached warrants to purchase an aggregate of 5,211,542 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.13 per share. The Series B shares were sold at a price per share of $5,000 and each Series B share is convertible into approximately 38,461 shares of common stock at a conversion price of $0.13 per share. The Company received $1,355,000 from the sale of the Series B shares. Since the Series B shares may ultimately be redeemable at the option of the holder, the carrying value of the Series B shares, net of discount and accumulated dividends, has been classified as redeemable preferred stock on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.
In accordance with ASC 470 Topic “Debt”, a portion of the proceeds were allocated to the warrants based on their relative fair value, which totaled $427,895 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Further, the Company attributed a beneficial conversion feature of $427,895 to the Series B shares based upon the difference between the effective conversion price of those shares and the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance. The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model are as follows: (1) dividend yield of 0%; (2) expected volatility of 129%, (3) weighted average risk-free interest rate of 0.26%, (4) expected life of approximately 3.5 years, and (5) estimated fair value of Telkonet common stock of $0.12 per share. The expected term of the warrants represents the estimated period of time until exercise and is based on historical experience of similar awards and giving consideration to the contractual terms. The amounts attributable to the warrants and beneficial conversion feature, aggregating $855,790, have been recorded as a discount and deducted from the face value of the Series B shares. The discount is being amortized over the period from issuance to November 19, 2014 (the initial redemption date) as a charge to additional paid-in capital (since there is a deficit in retained earnings).
The charge to additional paid in capital for amortization of Series B discount and costs for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 was $88,488 and $105,210, respectively.
For the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, we have accrued dividends for Series B in the amount of $48,648 and $49,188, respectively, and cumulative accrued dividends of $468,481 and $271,185 as of March 31 2013 and 2012, respectively. The accrued dividends have been charged to additional paid-in capital (since there is a deficit in retained earnings) and the net unpaid accrued dividends been added to the carrying value of the preferred stock.
15 |
TELKONET, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 2013
(UNAUDITED)
Preferred stock carries certain preference rights as detailed in the Company’s Amended Articles of Incorporation related to both the payment of dividends and as to payments upon liquidation in preference to any other class or series of capital stock of the Company. Liquidation preference of the preferred stock is based on the following order: first, Series B with a preference value of $2,933,481 and second, Series A with a preference value of $1,194,329. Both series of preferred stock are equal in their dividend preference over common stock.
NOTE I – CAPITAL STOCK
The Company has authorized 15,000,000 shares of preferred stock (designated and undesignated), with a par value of $.001 per share. As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 the Company has 215 and 538 shares of preferred stock issued and 185 and 493 shares outstanding, designated Series A and B preferred stock, respectively.
The Company has authorized 190,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $.001 per share. As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 the Company has 108,103,001 common shares issued and outstanding, respectively.
During the three months ended March 31, 2013, no shares of common stock were issued.
During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company issued 165,568 shares of common stock to directors and management for services performed through March 31, 2012. These shares were valued at $30,000, which approximated the fair value of the shares when they were issued.
NOTE J – STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS
Employee Stock Options
The Company maintains one equity incentive plan. The plan was established in 2010 as an incentive plan for officers, employees, non employee directors, prospective employees and other key persons. It is anticipated that providing such persons with a direct stake in the Company’s welfare will assure a better alignment of their interests with those of the Company and its stockholders.
The following table summarizes the changes in options outstanding and the related prices for the shares of the Company’s common stock issued to employees of the Company under a non-qualified employee stock option plan.
Options Outstanding | Options Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise Prices |
Number Outstanding |
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years) |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
Number Exercisable |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
|||||||||||||||||
$ | 0.01 - $0.15 | 175,000 | 4.57 | $ | 0.14 | 175,000 | $ | 0.14 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 0.16 - $0.99 | 915,642 | 9.17 | 0.19 | 645,642 | 0.19 | ||||||||||||||||
$ | 1.00 - $5.99 | 190,000 | 2.53 | 3.14 | 190,000 | 3.14 | ||||||||||||||||
1,280,642 | 7.55 | $ | 0.62 | 1,010,642 | $ | 0.73 |
Transactions involving stock options issued to employees are summarized as follows:
Number of Shares | Weighted Average Price Per Share | |||||||
Outstanding at January 1, 2012 | 685,000 | $ | 1.45 | |||||
Granted | 915,642 | 0.19 | ||||||
Exercised | – | – | ||||||
Cancelled or expired | (320,000 | ) | 1.16 | |||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2012 | 1,280,642 | $ | 0.62 | |||||
Granted | – | – | ||||||
Exercised | – | – | ||||||
Cancelled or expired | – | – | ||||||
Outstanding at March 31, 2013 | 1,280,642 | $ | 0.62 |
16 |
TELKONET, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 2013
(UNAUDITED)
The expected life of awards granted represents the period of time that they are expected to be outstanding. We determine the expected life based on historical experience with similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms, vesting schedules, exercise patterns and pre-vesting and post-vesting forfeitures. We estimate the volatility of our common stock based on the calculated historical volatility of our own common stock using the trailing 24 months of share price data prior to the date of the award. We base the risk-free interest rate used in the Black-Scholes option valuation model on the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with an equivalent remaining term equal to the expected life of the award. We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Consequently, we use an expected dividend yield of zero in the Black-Scholes option valuation model. We use historical data to estimate pre-vesting option forfeitures and record share-based compensation for those awards that are expected to vest. In accordance with ASC 718-10, we adjust share-based compensation for changes to the estimate of expected equity award forfeitures based on actual forfeiture experience.
There were no options granted and no options exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012. Total stock-based compensation expense in connection with options granted to employees recognized in the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 was $2,023 and $6,165 respectively.
Warrants
The following table summarizes the changes in warrants outstanding and the related prices for the shares of the Company’s common stock issued to non-employees of the Company. These warrants were granted in lieu of cash compensation for services performed or financing expenses and in connection with placement of convertible preferred stock.
Warrants Outstanding | Warrants Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise Prices |
Number Outstanding |
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years) |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
Number Exercisable |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
|||||||||||||||||
$ | 0.13 | 7,439,240 | 2.87 | $ | 0.13 | 7,439,240 | $ | 0.13 | ||||||||||||||
0.33 | 1,628,800 | 1.64 | 0.33 | 1,628,800 | 0.33 | |||||||||||||||||
0.60 | 800,000 | 0.10 | 0.60 | 800,000 | 0.60 | |||||||||||||||||
3.00 | 770,485 | 1.60 | 3.00 | 770,485 | 3.00 | |||||||||||||||||
10,638,525 | 2.38 | $ | 0.40 | 10,638,525 | $ | 0.40 |
Transactions involving warrants are summarized as follows:
Number of Shares | Weighted Average Price Per Share | |||||||
Outstanding at January 1, 2012 | 14,921,920 | $ | 0.50 | |||||
Issued | – | – | ||||||
Exercised | (3,115,390 | ) | 0.13 | |||||
Canceled or expired | (976,114 | ) | 2.20 | |||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2012 | 10,830,416 | 0.45 | ||||||
Issued | – | – | ||||||
Exercised | – | – | ||||||
Canceled or expired | (191,891 | ) | 3.00 | |||||
Outstanding at March 31, 2013 | 10,638,525 | $ | 0.40 |
The Company did not issue any warrants during the three month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012.
NOTE K – RELATED PARTIES
From time to time the Company may receive advances from certain of its officers in the form of salary deferment and cash advances, to meet short term working capital needs. These advances may not have formal repayment terms or arrangements. As of March 31, 2013 and 2012 there were no such arrangements.
17 |
TELKONET, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 2013
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE L – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Office Lease Obligations
The Company presently leases approximately 14,000 square feet of office space in Milwaukee, Wisconsin for its corporate headquarters. The Milwaukee lease expires in March 2020.
The Company presently leases 16,416 square feet of commercial office space in Germantown, Maryland. The lease commitments expire in December 2015. On July 15, 2011, Telkonet executed a sublease agreement for 11,626 square feet of the office space in Germantown, Maryland. On June 27, 2012 the subtenant exercised the option to extend the expiration of the term of the sublease from January 31, 2013 to December 31, 2015.
Commitments for minimum rentals under non cancelable leases at March 31, 2013 are as follows:
2013 (remainder of) | $ | 302,929 | ||
2014 | 414,267 | |||
2015 | 426,399 | |||
2016 | 169,155 | |||
2017 | 174,099 | |||
2018 and thereafter | 410,184 | |||
Total | $ | 1,897,033 |
Expected rent payments to be received under the sublease agreement at March 31, 2013 are as follows:
2013 (remainder of) | $ | 98,611 | ||
2014 | 134,872 | |||
2015 | 138,919 | |||
Total | $ | 372,402 |
Rental expenses charged to operations for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 were $129,320 and $133,040, respectively. Rental income received for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 was $32,332 and $31,389, respectively.
Employment Agreements
The Company has employment agreements with certain of its key employees which include non-disclosure and confidentiality provisions for protection of the Company’s proprietary information.
Jason L. Tienor, President and Chief Executive Officer, is employed pursuant to an employment agreement with us dated May 1, 2013. Mr. Tienor’s employment agreement has a term of two (2) years, which may be extended by mutual agreement of the parties thereto, and provides, among other things, for an annual base salary of $206,000 per year and bonuses and benefits based on our internal policies and participation in our incentive and benefit plans.
Jeffrey J. Sobieski, Chief Operating Officer, is employed pursuant to an employment agreement with us dated May 1, 2013. Mr. Sobieski’s employment agreement has a term of two (2) years, which may be extended by mutual agreement of the parties thereto, and provides for a base salary of $195,700 per year and bonuses and benefits based upon our internal policies and participation in our incentive and benefit plans.
Richard E. Mushrush, Chief Financial Officer, is employed pursuant to an employment agreement, dated May 1, 2013. Mr. Mushrush’s employment agreement is for a term expiring on May 1, 2014, is renewable at the agreement of the parties and provides for a base salary of at least $113,300 per year.
Gerrit J. Reinders, Executive Vice President-Global Sales and Marketing, is employed pursuant to an employment agreement, dated May 1, 2013. Mr. Reinder’s employment agreement is for a term expiring on May 1, 2014, is renewable at the agreement of the parties and provides for a base salary of at least $154,500 per year.
18 |
TELKONET, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 2013
(UNAUDITED)
Matthew P. Koch, Chief Operating Officer, is employed pursuant to an employment agreement, dated May 1, 2013. Mr. Koch’s employment agreement is for a term expiring on May 1, 2014, is renewable at the agreement of the parties and provides for a base salary of at least $133,900 per year.
In addition to the foregoing, stock options are periodically granted to employees under the Company’s 2010 equity incentive Plan at the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. Executives of the Company are eligible to receive stock option grants, based upon individual performance and the performance of the Company as a whole.
Litigation
The Company is subject to legal proceedings and claims which arise in the ordinary course of its business. Although occasional adverse decisions or settlements may occur, the Company believes that the final disposition of such matters should not have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
Linksmart Wireless Technology, LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
On July 1, 2008, Linksmart Wireless Technology, LLC, or Linksmart, filed a civil lawsuit in the Eastern District of Texas against EthoStream, LLC, our wholly-owned subsidiary and 22 other defendants (Linksmart Wireless Technology, LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., et al, U.S. District Court, for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, No. 2:08-cv-00264). This lawsuit alleges that the defendants’ services infringe a wireless network security patent held by Linksmart. Linksmart seeks a permanent injunction enjoining the defendants from infringing, inducing the infringement of, or contributing to the infringement of its patent, an award of damages and attorney’s fees.
Defendant Ramada Worldwide, Inc. provided us with notice of the suit and demanded that we defend and indemnify it pursuant to a vendor direct supplier agreement between EthoStream and WWC Supplier Services, Inc., a Ramada affiliate (wherein we agreed to indemnify, defend and hold only Ethostream supported Ramada properties harmless from and against claims of infringement). After a review of that agreement, it was determined that EthoStream owes the duty to defend and indemnify with respect to services provided by Telkonet to Ramada and it has assumed Ramada’s defense.
The parties in the lawsuit agreed to and the Court ordered a stay of the litigation pending the conclusion of a reexamination proceeding in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office relating to the patent involved in the lawsuit. The case was reopened in early 2012 based on the expectation that a reexamination certificate would be issued by the Patent Office. The reexamination certificate has been issued. After the case resumed, the parties agreed to a “transfer” of the case from the Eastern District of Texas to the Central District of California. To accomplish the “transfer,” with the agreement of the parties, the Texas case was dismissed and a new action was filed in California on April 5, 2012. (Linksmart Wireless Technology, LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., et al, U.S. District Court, for the Central District of California, Southern Division, No. SACV 12-522-JST). The parties have answered the complaint filed in the new action and the court has set the litigation calendar with trial set for June 2014. Management is presently unable to predict the ultimate resolution of this matter.
Stephen L. Sadle v. Telkonet, Inc
On 5, 2011, a former executive, Stephen L. Sadle, served Telkonet, Inc. and Telkonet Communications, Inc. ("Telkonet") with a Complaint in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, MD alleging (1) Breach of Contract, (2) Promissory Estoppel/Detrimental Reliance and (3) violation of Maryland's Wage Payment and Collection Act. The three claims in his Complaint each arose out of his departure in 2007. In terms of relief, Mr. Sadle sought "severance compensation" in the amount of $195,000, treble damages, interest, and attorneys’ fees. This lawsuit was resolved as part of a voluntary settlement prior to the scheduled jury trial beginning on May 14, 2012. On July 26, 2012, the Parties filed a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice.
In the case of Stephen L. Sadle v Telkonet, Inc., the parties executed a settlement agreement and general release on July 2, 2012 for $100,000. Terms of the agreement called for Telkonet to make an initial payment of $30,000 on June 1, 2012 and Telkonet made an additional scheduled payment on September 1, 2012. The remaining balance was paid in three equal installments by March 1, 2013.
Sales Tax
The Company engaged a sales tax consultant to assist in determining the extent of its potential sales tax exposure. Based upon this analysis, management determined the Company had probable exposure for certain unpaid obligations, including interest and penalty, of approximately $1,100,000 including and prior to the year ended December 31, 2011. The Company has approximately $1,162,000 accrued as of March 31, 2013. The Company continues to manage the liability by establishing voluntary disclosure agreements (“VDAs”) with applicable states, which establishes a maximum look-back period and payment arrangements. However, if the aforementioned methods prove unsuccessful and the Company is examined or challenged by taxing authorities, there exists possible exposure of an additional $620,000, not including any applicable interest and penalties.
19 |
TELKONET, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 2013
(UNAUDITED)
During 2012, the Company successfully executed, and paid in full, VDAs in five states totaling approximately $23,000 and is current with the subsequent filing requirements. It has submitted VDAs with an additional twenty-seven states and awaits notification of acceptance. Two states offer no voluntarily disclosure program. The Company also confirmed that one customer had self assessed, further reducing our liability and expense associated with that liability by approximately $151,000.
During the period ended March 31, 2013, the Company successfully executed and paid in full three states totaling approximately $25,000. In addition, the Company executed VDAs with two other states and has established payment plan agreements with these states.
The following table sets forth the change in the sales tax accrual as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012:
March 31, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | |||||||
Balance, beginning of year | $ | 1,188,133 | $ | 1,068,314 | ||||
Collections | 70,920 | 277,374 | ||||||
Provisions | (23,842 | ) | (119,255 | ) | ||||
Interest and penalties | 5,000 | 32,696 | ||||||
Payments | (77,729 | ) | (70,996 | ) | ||||
Balance end of period | $ | 1,162,482 | $ | 1,188,133 |
NOTE M – BUSINESS CONCENTRATION
For the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Company had one customer that represented 10% of net revenues. This customer had an accounts receivable balance of $158,171 as of March 31, 2013. For the three months ended March 31, 2012, no single customer represented 10% or more of total net revenues.
Purchases from two major suppliers approximated $919,119, or 71%, of purchases, and $571,548, or 79%, of purchases, for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Total due to these suppliers, net of deposits, was approximately $432,000 as of March 31, 2013, and $0 as of March 31, 2012.
20 |
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto for the quarter ended March 31, 2013, as well as the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto and management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, filed April 1, 2013.
Business
Telkonet, Inc., formed in 1999 and incorporated under the laws of the state of Utah, is made up of two synergistic business divisions, EcoSmart Energy Management Technology and EthoStream High Speed Internet Access (HSIA) Network.
Our EcoSmart Suite of products (which include Telkonet’s legacy “SmartEnergy” products) provides comprehensive savings, management and reporting of a building's room-by-room energy consumption. Telkonet's energy management products are currently installed in over 200,000 rooms in properties within the hospitality, military, educational and healthcare markets. The EcoSmart technology platform is rapidly being recognized as a leading solution-provider for reducing energy consumption, carbon footprints, and eliminating the need for new energy generation in these marketplaces – all while improving occupant comfort and convenience.
Controlling energy consumption can make a significant impact on a property owner’s bottom line, as heating, ventilation and air conditioning (“HVAC”) costs represent a substantial portion of a facility’s overall utility bill. Hospitality is a key market for Telkonet. According to the EPA EnergySTAR for Hospitality analysis, the median hotel uses approximately 70,000 Btu/ft2 from all energy sources. Since fewer than 20% of the hotels in North America have an energy management system, there is considerable opportunity to assist those lodging facilities that are more energy intensive than necessary. With approximately 47,000 hotels in the USA alone, the market size is substantial.
Telkonet’s EthoStream is one of the largest public High-Speed Internet Access (“HSIA”) providers in the world, providing services to more than 5.1 million users monthly across a network of greater than 2,300 locations. With a wide range of product and service offerings and one of the most comprehensive management platforms available for HSIA networks, EthoStream offers solutions for any public access location.
Our direct sales efforts target the hospitality, education, commercial, utility and government/military markets. Taking advantage of legislation, including the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, or EISA, the Energy Policy Act of 2005, and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act we’ve focused our sales efforts in areas with available public funding and incentives, such as rebate programs offered by utilities for efficiency upgrades. Through our proprietary platform, technology and partnerships with energy efficiency providers, we intend to position our Company as a leading provider of energy management solutions.
Telkonet’s Series 5 Smart Grid networking technology allows commercial, industrial and consumer users to connect intelligent devices to a communications network using the existing low voltage electrical grid. Series 5 technology uses power line communications, or PLC, technology to transform existing electrical infrastructure into a communications backbone. Operating at 200 Mbps, the PLC platform offers a secure alternative in grid communications, transforming a traditional electrical distribution system into a “smart grid” that delivers electricity in a manner that can save energy, reduce cost and increase reliability.
On March 4, 2011, the Company sold its Series 5 power line communications product line and related business assets to Dynamic Ratings, Inc. (“Dynamic Ratings”). The sales price was $1,000,000 in cash. In connection with the sale, Dynamic Ratings lent $700,000 to the Company in the form of a 6% promissory note dated March 4, 2011. Concurrently with the sale, the Company entered into a Distributorship Agreement and a Consulting Agreement with Dynamic Ratings. Under the Distributorship Agreement, the Company was designated as a distributor of the Series 5 product to non-utility markets and will receive preferred pricing for purchases of Series 5 product. Under the Consulting Agreement, the Company agreed to provide Dynamic Ratings with ongoing transition assistance and consulting services for the Series 5 product. The Distributorship Agreement and the Consulting Agreement have initial terms that expire on March 31, 2013 and March 31, 2014, respectively. Proceeds payable to the Company under the Distributorship Agreement and the Consulting Agreement for a stated period of time will be applied against the outstanding accrued interest and principal balance of the Promissory Note.
21 |
Forward Looking Statements
In accordance with the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, we can obtain a “safe-harbor” for forward-looking statements by identifying those statements and by accompanying those statements with cautionary statements which identify factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Accordingly, the following “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” may contain certain forward-looking statements regarding strategic growth initiatives, growth opportunities and management’s expectations regarding orders and financial results for the remainder of 2013 and future periods. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and current assumptions which management believes are reasonable. However, these statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from any future results encompassed within the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include those risks affecting the Company’s business as described in the Company’s filings with the SEC, including the current reports on Form 8-K, which factors are incorporated herein by reference. The Company expressly disclaims a duty to provide updates to forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or other occurrences.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate significant estimates used in preparing our condensed consolidated financial statements including those related to revenue recognition, uncollectible accounts receivable, guarantees and product warranties, stock based compensation, potential impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets, contingent liabilities and business combinations. We base our estimates on historical experience, underlying run rates and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The following are critical judgments, assumptions, and estimates used in the preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
For revenue from product sales, we recognize revenue in accordance with ASC 605-10, and ASC Topic 13 guidelines that require that four basic criteria must be met before revenue can be recognized: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred; (3) the selling price is fixed and determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. Determination of criteria (3) and (4) are based on management’s judgments regarding the fixed nature of the selling prices of the products delivered and the collectability of those amounts. Provisions for discounts and rebates to customers, estimated returns and allowances, and other adjustments are provided for in the same period the related sales are recorded. The guidelines also address the accounting for arrangements that may involve the delivery or performance of multiple products, services and/or rights to use assets.
Multiple-Element Arrangements (“MEAs”): The Company accounts for large contracts that have both product and installation under the MEAs guidance in ASC 605. The Company believes the volume of these large contracts will continue to increase. Arrangements under such contracts may include multiple deliverables, a combination of equipment and services. The deliverables included in the MEAs are separated into more than one unit of accounting when (i) the delivered equipment has value to the customer on a stand-alone basis, and (ii) delivery of the undelivered service element(s) is probable and substantially in our control. Arrangement consideration is then allocated to each unit, delivered or undelivered, based on the relative selling price (“RSP”) of each unit of accounting based first on vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) if it exists, second on third-party evidence (“TPE”) if it exists and on estimated selling price (“ESP”) if neither VSOE or TPE exist.
· | VSOE – In most instances, products are sold separately in stand-alone arrangements. Services are also sold separately through renewals of contracts with varying periods. We determine VSOE based on its pricing and discounting practices for the specific product or service when sold separately, considering geographical, customer, and other economic or marketing variables, as well as renewal rates or stand-alone prices for the service element(s). |
· | TPE – If we cannot establish VSOE of selling price for a specific product or service included in a multiple-element arrangement, we use third-party evidence of selling price. We determine TPE based on sales of comparable amount of similar product or service offered by multiple third parties considering the degree of customization and similarity of product or service sold. |
· | ESP – The estimated selling price represents the price at which we would sell a product or service if it were sold on a stand-alone basis. When neither VSOE nor TPE exists for all elements, we determine ESP for the arrangement element based on sales, cost and margin analysis, as well as other inputs based on its pricing practices. Adjustments for other market and Company-specific factors are made as deemed necessary in determining ESP. |
When MEAs include an element of customer training, it is not essential to the functionality, efficiency or effectiveness of the MEA. Therefore the Company has concluded that this obligation is inconsequential and perfunctory. As such, for MEAs that include training, customer acceptance is not deemed necessary in order to record the related revenue, but is recorded when the installation deliverable is fulfilled. Historically, training revenues have not been significant.
22 |
We provide call center support services to properties installed by us and also to properties installed by other providers. In addition, we provide the property with the portal to access the Internet. We receive monthly service fees from such properties for our services and Internet access. We recognize the service fee ratably over the term of the contract. The prices for these services are fixed and determinable prior to delivery of the service. The fair value of these services is known due to objective and reliable evidence from contracts and standalone sales. We report such revenues as recurring revenues.
Total revenues do not include sales tax as we consider ourselves a pass through conduit for collection and remitting sales tax.
New Accounting Pronouncements
For information regarding recent accounting pronouncements and their effect on the Company, see “New Accounting Pronouncements” in Note B of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained herein.
Revenues
The table below outlines product versus recurring revenues for comparable periods:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2013 | March 31, 2012 | Variance | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Product | $ | 2,165,500 | 69% | $ | 917,929 | 48% | $ | 1,247,571 | 136% | |||||||||||||||
Recurring | 962,134 | 31% | 1,010,672 | 52% | (48,538 | ) | -5% | |||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 3,127,634 | 100% | $ | 1,928,601 | 100% | $ | 1,199,033 | 62% |
Product Revenue
Product revenue principally arises from the sale and installation of EcoSmart Suite of products, SmartGrid and High Speed Internet Access equipment. These include TSE, Telkonet Series 5, Telkonet iWire, and wireless networking products. We market and sell to the hospitality, education, healthcare and government/military markets. The Telkonet Series 5 and the Telkonet iWire products consist of the Telkonet Gateways, Telkonet Extenders, the patented Telkonet Coupler, and Telkonet iBridges. The EcoSmart Suite of products consist of thermostats, sensors, controllers, wireless networking products switches, outlets and a control platform. The HSIA product suite consists of gateway servers, switches and access points.
For the three months ended March 31, 2013, product revenue increased by 136% when compared to the prior year period. Product revenue in 2013 includes approximately $1.1 million attributed to the sale and installation of energy management products, and approximately $1.1 million for the sale and installation of HSIA products. The increase in product revenue can be attributed to resources committed to sales and marketing over the past year.
Recurring Revenue
Recurring revenue is primarily attributed to recurring services. The Company recognizes revenue ratably over the service month for monthly support revenues and defers revenue for annual support services over the term of the service period. The recurring revenue consists primarily of HSIA support services and advertising revenue. Advertising revenue is based on impression-based statistics for a given period from customer site visits to the Company’s login portal page under the terms of advertising agreements entered into with third-parties. A component of our recurring revenue is derived from fees, less payback costs, associated with approximately 1% of our hospitality customers who do not internally manage guest-related, internet transactions.
Recurring revenue includes approximately 2,300 hotels in our broadband network portfolio. We currently support approximately 231,000 HSIA rooms. For the three months ended March 31, 2013, recurring revenue decreased by 5% when compared to the prior year period.
Cost of Sales
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2013 | March 31, 2012 | Variance | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Product | $ | 1,429,546 | 66% | $ | 600,809 | 65% | $ | 828,737 | 138% | |||||||||||||||
Recurring | 266,163 | 28% | 289,909 | 29% | (23,746 | ) | -8% | |||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,695,709 | 54% | $ | 890,718 | 46% | $ | 804,991 | 90% |
Product Costs
Costs of product sales include equipment and installation labor related to the sale of SmartGrid and broadband networking equipment, including EcoSmart technology and Telkonet iWire. For the year ended three months ended March 31, 2013, product costs increased by 138% when compared to the prior year. The increase was attributed to the additional cost of goods sold and services associated with the increase in product sales and the use of additional subcontractor services for installations.
23 |
Recurring Costs
Recurring costs are comprised of labor and telecommunication services for our Customer Service department. For the three months ended March 31, 2013, recurring costs decreased by 8% when compared to the prior year period. The decrease is attributed to the decrease in recurring revenue.
Gross Profit
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2013 | March 31, 2012 | Variance | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Product | $ | 735,954 | 34% | $ | 317,120 | 35% | $ | 418,834 | 132% | |||||||||||||||
Recurring | 695,971 | 72% | 720,763 | 71% | (24,792 | ) | -3% | |||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,431,925 | 46% | $ | 1,037,883 | 54% | $ | 394,042 | 38% |
Product Gross Profit
The gross profit on product revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2013 increased by 132%, when compared to the prior year period. The variances were a result of increased product sales and installations on energy management and HSIA sales.
Recurring Gross Profit
Our gross profit associated with recurring revenue decreased by 3% for the three months ended March 31, 2013. The decrease was mainly due to the reduction in recurring revenues.
Operating Expenses
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | Variance | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,826,853 | $ | 1,734,943 | $ | 91,910 | 5% |
During the three months ended March 31, 2013, operating expenses increased by 5% when compared to the prior year period. The increase was attributed to the continuing development of our EcoSmart Suite product line and additional hiring of sales personnel.
Research and Development
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | Variance | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 302,142 | $ | 230,564 | $ | 71,578 | 31% |
Our research and development costs related to both present and future products are expensed in the period incurred. Current research and development costs are associated with product development and integration. During the three months ended March 31, 2013, research and development costs increased 31% compared to the prior year period. The increase is due to additional expenditures for salaries, consulting, test equipment and tooling.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | Variance | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,460,593 | $ | 1,431,781 | $ | 28,812 | 2% |
During the three months ended March 31, 2013, selling, general and administrative expenses increased over the comparable prior year period by 2%. The increase is primarily the result of expenditures for sales personnel.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We have financed our operations since inception primarily through private and public offerings of our equity securities, the issuance of various debt instruments and asset based lending.
24 |
Working Capital
Our working capital decreased by $579,196 during the three months ended March 31, 2013 from working capital (current assets in excess of current liabilities) of $414,649 at December 31, 2012 to a working capital deficit (current liabilities in excess of currant assets) of $164,547 at March 31, 2013.
Business Loan
On September 11, 2009, the Company entered into a Loan Agreement in the aggregate principal amount of $300,000 with the Wisconsin Department of Commerce (the “Department”). The outstanding principal balance bears interest at the annual rate of 2%. Payment of interest and principal is to be made in the following manner: (a) payment of any and all interest that accrues from the date of disbursement commenced on January 1, 2010 and continued on the first day of each consecutive month thereafter through and including December 31, 2010; (b) commencing on January 1, 2011 and continuing on the first day of each consecutive month thereafter through and including November 1, 2016, the Company shall pay equal monthly installments of $4,426 each; followed by a final installment on December 1, 2016 which shall include all remaining principal, accrued interest and other amounts owed by the Company to the Department under the Loan Agreement. The Company may prepay amounts outstanding under the credit facility in whole or in part at any time without penalty. The Loan Agreement is secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets and the proceeds from this loan were used for the working capital requirements of the Company. The Loan Agreement contains covenants which require, among other things, that the Company shall keep and maintain 75 existing full-time positions and create and fill 35 additional full-time positions in Milwaukee, Wisconsin by December 31, 2012. On June 18, 2012, the Department agreed to waive all penalties associated with the Company’s noncompliance with this covenant. The outstanding borrowings under the agreement as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were $191,668 and $203,947, respectively.
Promissory Note #1
On March 4, 2011, the Company sold all its Series 5 PLC product line assets to Wisconsin-based Dynamic Ratings, Inc. (“Purchaser”) under an Asset Purchase Agreement (“APA”). Per the APA, the Company signed an unsecured Promissory Note (“Note #1”) due to Purchaser in the aggregate principal amount of $700,000. The outstanding principal balance bears interest at the annual rate of 6% and was originally due on March 31, 2014. Note #1 may be prepaid in whole or in part, without penalty at any time. Note #1 contains certain earn-out provisions that encompass both the Company’s and Purchaser’s revenue volumes. Amounts earned under the earn-out provisions shall be applied against Note #1 on June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2013. As of June 30, 2012, the non cash reduction of principal calculated under these provisions and applied to the note was $15,408. Payments not made when due, by maturity acceleration or otherwise, shall bear interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date due until fully paid. Effective April 30, 2013, Purchaser approved an amendment to certain terms of the Note #1. Telkonet has agreed to commence a monthly payment of principal and interest of $20,000 to be applied against the outstanding balance starting May 1, 2013. The interest rate will remain unchanged at 6% and the maturity date was extended to January 1, 2016. The outstanding principal balance of Note #1 as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was $684,592.
Cash Flow Analysis
Cash provided by continuing operations was $471,112 during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and cash used in continuing operations was $394,575 during the three months ended March 31, 2012. As of March 31, 2013, our primary capital needs included business strategy execution, inventory procurement and managing current liabilities.
Cash used in investing activities from continuing operations was $396,725 and $3,995 during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. During the period ended December 31, 2012, the Company was awarded a contract that required a bonding requirement. During the period ended March 31, 2013, the Company satisfied this requirement with cash collateral supported by an irrevocable standby letter of credit in the amount of $382,000.
Cash used in financing activities to repay indebtedness was $12,279 and $24,783 during the three month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Our independent registered public accountants report on our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012 includes an explanatory paragraph relating to our ability to continue as a going concern. We have incurred operating losses in past years and are dependent upon our ability to develop profitable operations and/or obtain necessary funding from outside sources, including by the sale of our securities, or obtaining loans from financial institutions, where possible. These factors, among others, raise doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern and may also affect our ability to obtain financing in the future.
Management expects that global economic conditions will continue to present a challenging operating environment through 2013; therefore working capital management will continue to be a high priority for the remainder of 2013.
25 |
The Company continues to manage its sales tax liability of approximately $1,162,000 by establishing VDAs with the applicable states, which establishes a maximum look-back period and payment arrangements. However, if the aforementioned methods prove unsuccessful and the Company is examined or challenged by taxing authorities, there exists possible exposure of an additional $620,000 in sales tax liability, not including any applicable interest and penalties.
During 2012, the Company successfully executed, and paid in full, VDAs in five states totaling approximately $23,000 and is current with the subsequent filing requirements. It has submitted VDAs with an additional twenty-seven states and awaits notification of acceptance. Two states offer no voluntarily disclosure program. The Company also confirmed that one customer had self assessed, further reducing our liability and expense associated with that liability by approximately $151,000.
During the period ended March 31, 2013, the Company successfully executed and paid in full three states totaling approximately $25,000. In addition, the Company executed VDAs with two other states and has set up payment plan agreements with these states.
Additional financing may be required in order to meet our future cash flow requirements from operations. We cannot predict whether this new financing, if it is required, will be in the form of equity or debt or in another form. We may not be able to obtain the necessary additional capital on a timely basis, on acceptable terms, or at all. Additional investments are being sought, but we cannot guarantee that we will be able to obtain such investments. Financing transactions may include the issuance of equity or debt securities, obtaining credit facilities, or other financing mechanisms. However, the trading price of our common stock and the continued economic instability could make it more difficult to obtain financing through the issuance of equity or debt securities. Even if we are able to raise the funds required, it is possible that we could incur unexpected costs and expenses, fail to collect significant amounts owed to us, or experience unexpected cash requirements that would force us to seek alternative financing. Further, if we issue additional equity or debt securities, stockholders may experience additional dilution or the new equity securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of existing holders of our common stock. If additional financing is not available or is not available on acceptable terms, we may have to curtail our operations.
Off-Balance sheet Arrangements
The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements other than its facility leases.
Acquisition or Disposition of Property and Equipment
During the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Company spent $14,725 of expenditures for equipment. The Company does not anticipate any significant purchases of property or equipment during the next twelve months, other than computer equipment and peripherals to be used in the Company’s day-to-day operations.
We presently lease two commercial office spaces in Germantown, Maryland totaling, in the aggregate, 16,400 square feet. Both leases expire in December 2015. On July 15, 2011, Telkonet executed a sublease agreement for 11,626 square feet of its space located in Germantown, Maryland. On June 27, 2012 the subtenant exercised its option to extend the expiration of the term of the sublease from January 31, 2013 to December 31, 2015.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
As of March 31, 2013, the Company performed an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures. Due to the lack of a segregation of duties and failure to implement accounting controls, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
During the three months ended March 31, 2013, there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
Litigation
The Company is subject to legal proceedings and claims which arise in the ordinary course of its business. Although occasional adverse decisions or settlements may occur, the Company believes that the final disposition of such matters should not have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
26 |
Linksmart Wireless Technology, LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
On July 1, 2008, Linksmart Wireless Technology, LLC, or Linksmart, filed a civil lawsuit in the Eastern District of Texas against EthoStream, LLC, our wholly-owned subsidiary and 22 other defendants (Linksmart Wireless Technology, LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., et al, U.S. District Court, for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, No. 2:08-cv-00264). This lawsuit alleges that the defendants’ services infringe a wireless network security patent held by Linksmart. Linksmart seeks a permanent injunction enjoining the defendants from infringing, inducing the infringement of, or contributing to the infringement of its patent, an award of damages and attorney’s fees.
Defendant Ramada Worldwide, Inc. provided us with notice of the suit and demanded that we defend and indemnify it pursuant to a vendor direct supplier agreement between EthoStream and WWC Supplier Services, Inc., a Ramada affiliate (wherein we agreed to indemnify, defend and hold only Ethostream supported Ramada properties harmless from and against claims of infringement). After a review of that agreement, it was determined that EthoStream owes the duty to defend and indemnify with respect to services provided by Telkonet to Ramada and it has assumed Ramada’s defense.
The parties in the lawsuit agreed to and the Court ordered a stay of the litigation pending the conclusion of a reexamination proceeding in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office relating to the patent involved in the lawsuit. The case was reopened in early 2012 based on the expectation that a reexamination certificate would be issued by the Patent Office. The reexamination certificate has been issued. After the case resumed, the parties agreed to a “transfer” of the case from the Eastern District of Texas to the Central District of California. To accomplish the “transfer,” with the agreement of the parties, the Texas case was dismissed and a new action was filed in California on April 5, 2012. (Linksmart Wireless Technology, LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., et al, U.S. District Court, for the Central District of California, Southern Division, No. SACV 12-522-JST). The parties have answered the complaint filed in the new action and the court has set the litigation calendar with trial set for June 2014. Management presently is unable to predict the ultimate resolution of this matter.
Stephen L. Sadle v. Telkonet, Inc
On April 15, 2011, a former executive, Stephen L. Sadle, served Telkonet, Inc. and Telkonet Communications, Inc. ("Telkonet") with a Complaint in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, MD alleging (1) Breach of Contract, (2) Promissory Estoppel/Detrimental Reliance and (3) violation of Maryland's Wage Payment and Collection Act. The three claims in his Complaint each arose out of his departure in 2007. In terms of relief, Mr. Sadle sought "severance compensation" in the amount of $195,000, treble damages, interest, and attorneys’ fees. This lawsuit was resolved as part of a voluntary settlement prior to the scheduled jury trial beginning on May 14, 2012. On July 26, 2012, the Parties filed a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice.
In the case of Stephen L. Sadle v Telkonet, Inc., the parties executed a settlement agreement and general release on July 2, 2012 for $100,000. Terms of the agreement called for Telkonet to make an initial payment of $30,000 on June 1, 2012 and Telkonet made an additional scheduled payment on September 1, 2012. The remaining balance was paid in three equal installments by March 1, 2013.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
There have been no material changes to risk factors previously disclosed in our 2012 Annual Report in response to Item 1A of Form 10-K.
Item 6. Exhibits.
Exhibit Number | Description Of Document | |
31.1 | Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Jason L. Tienor | |
31.2 | Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Richard E. Mushrush | |
32.1 | Certification of Jason L. Tienor pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.2 | Certification of Richard E. Mushrush pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document | |
101.SCH | XBRL Schema Document | |
101.CAL | XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document | |
101.DEF | XBRL Definition Linkbase Document | |
101.LAB | XBRL Label Linkbase Document | |
101.PRE | XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document |
27 |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Telkonet, Inc. Registrant | ||
Date: May 13, 2013 | By: | /s/ Jason L. Tienor |
Jason L. Tienor Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) |
Date: May 13, 2013 | By: | /s/ Richard E. Mushrush |
Richard E. Mushrush Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) |
28 |