Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

v2.4.0.6
12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2012
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
NOTE L - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Office Lease Obligations

 

The Company presently leases approximately 14,000 square feet of office space in Milwaukee, Wisconsin for its corporate headquarters.  The Milwaukee lease expires in March 2020.  

 

The Company presently leases 16,416 square feet of commercial office space in Germantown, Maryland.  The lease commitments expire in December 2015.  On July 15, 2011, Telkonet executed a sublease agreement for 11,626 square feet of the office space in Germantown, Maryland.  The subtenant received one month rent abatement and has the option to extend the sublease from January 31, 2013 to December 31, 2015. On June 27, 2012 the subtenant exercised the option to extend the expiration of the term of the sublease from January 31, 2013 to December 31, 2015

 

Commitments for minimum rentals under non cancelable leases at June 30, 2012 are as follows:

 

2012 (Remainder of)   $ 195,521  
2013     402,948  
2014     414,263  
2015     426,399  
2016     169,156  
2017     174,098  
2018 and thereafter     410,179  
Total   $ 2,192,564  

 

Expected rent payments to be received under sublease agreement at June 30, 2012 are as follows:

 

2012 (Remainder of)   $ 64,348  
2013     130,942  
2014     134,872  
2015     138,919  
Total   $ 469,081  

 

Rental expenses charged to operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 are $128,919 and $152,843 and $261,959 and $322,835, respectively. Rental income received for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 was $31,389 and $62,778, respectively.

 

Employment Agreements

 

The Company has employment agreements with certain of its key employees which include non-disclosure and confidentiality provisions for protection of the Company’s proprietary information.

 

Jason L. Tienor, President and Chief Executive Officer, is employed pursuant to an employment agreement dated May 1, 2012.  Mr. Tienor’s employment agreement is for a term expiring on May 1, 2014, is renewable at the agreement of the parties and provides for a base salary of $200,000 per year.

 

Jeffrey J. Sobieski, Chief Technology Officer, is employed pursuant to an employment agreement, dated May 1, 2012. Mr. Sobieski’s employment agreement is for a term expiring on May 1, 2014, is renewable at the agreement of the parties and provides for a base salary of $190,000 per year. 

 

Richard E. Mushrush, Chief Financial Officer, is employed pursuant to an employment agreement, dated May 1, 2012. Mr. Mushrush’s employment agreement is for a term expiring on May 1, 2013, is renewable at the agreement of the parties and provides for a base salary of $110,000 per year.  

 

Gerrit J. Reinders, Executive Vice President-Global Sales and Marketing, is employed pursuant to an employment agreement, dated May 1, 2012. Mr. Reinder’s employment agreement is for a term expiring on May 1, 2013, is renewable at the agreement of the parties and provides for a base salary of $150,000 per year.  

 

Matthew P. Koch, Chief Operating Officer, is employed pursuant to an employment agreement, dated May 1, 2012. Mr. Koch’s employment agreement is for a term expiring on May 1, 2013, is renewable at the agreement of the parties and provides for a base salary of $130,000 per year.   

 

Litigation

 

The Company is subject to legal proceedings and claims which arise in the ordinary course of its business. Although occasional adverse decisions or settlements may occur, the Company believes that the final disposition of such matters should not have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

 

Linksmart Wireless Technology, LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.

 

On July 1, 2008, Linksmart Wireless Technology, LLC, or Linksmart, filed a civil lawsuit in the Eastern District of Texas against EthoStream, LLC, our wholly-owned subsidiary and 22 other defendants (Linksmart Wireless Technology, LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., et al, U.S. District Court, for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, No. 2:08-cv-00264).  This lawsuit alleges that the defendants’ services infringe a wireless network security patent held by Linksmart. Linksmart seeks a permanent injunction enjoining the defendants from infringing, inducing the infringement of, or contributing to the infringement of its patent, an award of damages and attorney’s fees.

   

Defendant Ramada Worldwide, Inc. provided us with notice of the suit and demanded that we defend and indemnify it pursuant to a vendor direct supplier agreement between EthoStream and WWC Supplier Services, Inc., a Ramada affiliate (wherein we agreed to indemnify, defend and hold only Ethostream supported Ramada properties harmless from and against claims of infringement).  After a review of that agreement, it was determined that EthoStream owes the duty to defend and indemnify with respect to services provided by Telkonet to Ramada and it has assumed Ramada’s defense.

 

The parties in the lawsuit agreed to and the Court ordered a stay of the litigation pending the conclusion of a reexamination proceeding in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office relating to the patent involved in the lawsuit.  The case was reopened in early 2012 based on the expectation that a reexamination certificate would be issued by the Patent Office. The reexamination certificate has been issued. After the case resumed, the parties agreed to a “transfer” of the case from the Eastern District of Texas to the Central District of California. To accomplish the “transfer,” with the agreement of the parties, the Texas case was dismissed and a new action was filed in California on April 5, 2012. (Linksmart Wireless Technology, LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., et al, U.S. District Court, for the Central District of California, Southern Division, No. SACV 12-522-JST). The parties have answered the complaint filed in the new action and a scheduling conference is set for October 19, 2012.

 

Robert P. Crabb v Telkonet Inc.

 

On November 9, 2010, a former executive, Robert P. Crabb, served Telkonet, Inc. and Telkonet Communications, Inc. ("Telkonet") with a Complaint in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, MD alleging (1) violation of Maryland’s Wage Payment and Collection Act (2) Breach of Contract and (3) Promissory Estoppel/Detrimental Reliance. The claims in his Complaint arose out of his retirement in September 2007. In terms of relief, Mr. Crabb sought "severance compensation" in the amount of $156,000, treble damages, interest, and attorneys’ fees. This lawsuit was resolved as part of a voluntary settlement prior to the scheduled four day jury trial beginning on December 12, 2011. On January 25, 2012, the Court entered the parties’ joint Stipulation of Dismissal.

 

In the case of Robert P. Crabb v Telkonet, Inc., the parties executed a settlement agreement and general release on January 20, 2012 for $127,000.  Terms of the agreement called for Telkonet to make an initial payment of $27,000 on January 27, 2012, and Telkonet made additional payments on March 1 and June 1, 2012.  The remaining balance is to be paid on or before September 1, 2012.  If Telkonet fails to make the payments within ten days of the specified date, Telkonet will be deemed in default.  In the event of such a default, Mr. Crabb may, at his option, demand the entire balance due (and unpaid) and will be entitled to 6% interest on $155,000 from May 1, 2008.

 

Stephen L. Sadle v. Telkonet, Inc

 

On April 15, 2011, a former executive, Stephen L. Sadle, served Telkonet, Inc. and Telkonet Communications, Inc. ("Telkonet") with a Complaint in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, MD alleging (1) Breach of Contract, (2) Promissory Estoppel/Detrimental Reliance and (3) violation of Maryland's Wage Payment and Collection Act. The three claims in his Complaint each arose out of his departure in 2007. In terms of relief, Mr. Sadle sought "severance compensation" in the amount of $195,000, treble damages, interest, and attorneys’ fees. This lawsuit was resolved as part of a voluntary settlement prior to the scheduled jury trial beginning on May 14, 2012. On July 26, 2012, the Parties filed a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice.

 

In the case of Stephen L. Sadle v Telkonet, Inc., the parties executed a settlement agreement and general release on July 2, 2012 for $100,000.  Terms of the agreement called for Telkonet to make an initial payment of $30,000 on June 1, 2012.  The remaining balance is to be paid in three equal installments on or before September 1, December 1, 2012 and March 1, 2013.  If Telkonet fails to make any of the above-specified payments within ten days of the specified date, Telkonet will be deemed in default.  In the event of such a default, Mr. Sadle may, at his option, demand the entire balance due (and unpaid) and will be entitled to 6% interest on $155,000 from May 1, 2008.

 

Sales Tax

 

The Company engaged a sales tax consultant to assist in determining the extent of its potential sales tax exposure.  Based upon this analysis, management determined the Company had probable exposure for certain unpaid obligations, including interest and penalty, of approximately $1,100,000 including and prior to the year ended December 31, 2011. The Company has approximately $1,233,000 accrued as of June 30, 2012.  The Company intends to manage the liability by (1) confirming if customers self-assessed and remitted tax to the applicable state(s) absent from our transactions (2) confirming if customers were subjected to a state audit and if so did it result in the customer paying tax absent from our transaction (3) invoicing customers for the back taxes and (4) establishing voluntary disclosure agreements with the applicable states, which establishes a maximum look-back period and payment arrangements.  However, if the aforementioned methods prove unsuccessful and the Company is examined or challenged by taxing authorities, there exists possible exposure of an additional $620,000, not including any applicable interest and penalties.

 

The following table sets forth the change in the sales tax accrual as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

 

    June 30,  2012     December 31, 2011  
Balance, Beginning of year   $ 1,068,314     $ 776,671  
Collections     134,064       162,975  
Accruals           75,979  
Interest and penalties     40,000       89,020  
Payments     (9,406 )     (36,331 )
Balance at end of period   $ 1,232,972     $ 1,068,314